Posts Tagged ‘mixed-orientation marriage’

THE BATTLE’S WON; THE WAR CONTINUES

June 27th, 2015 by Carol Grever

 

A major battle for legal gay marriage in the United States was finally concluded on June 26, 2015 in a landmark decision by a divided Supreme Court.  In a 5-4 decision, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority ruling that same-sex couples can now marry in every state of the union, establishing a consistent, nationwide policy that guarantees equal civil rights, regardless of sexual orientation or identification.  Same-sex couples now enjoy the same legal rights and benefits as married heterosexual couples.

This long-awaited legal protection of same-sex marriage represents the culmination of a gay-rights movement that began in New York in 1969 with the “Stonewall Riots.”  The “Rainbow Revolution,” advocating equal civil rights, has simmered and exploded in various locations since.  Finally, this question has been settled in this country—for the whole nation and territories, not just one state at a time. 

In a remarkable display of high level support for the court’s decision, President Barack Obama ordered that the exterior of the White House be lighted up with rainbow colors to celebrate.  However, this progress cannot be taken for granted, particularly in the wildly unpredictable political climate ushered in by the 2016 election of President Donald Trump.

For American straight spouses who have already suffered the consequences of ill-fated marriages to gays, this vital court decision came too late.  Their gay husbands or wives felt compelled, for a variety of individual reasons, to enter conventional male-female marriages.  Nearly all such relationships eventually fail, with the straight spouse the most obvious victim.  However, a mixed-orientation marriage that ends in divorce punishes everyone involved, including the gay partner and any children of the union.  No one wins.

Existing legal protections may have diminished the number of mixed-orientation marriages in the U.S., though it did not end these mismatches altogether.  Other significant societal factors remain, including family, social, career, and religious pressures. 

A fundamental change in public attitudes will be the ultimate deterrent to mixed-orientation relationships.  After a very slow start, public opinion here is moving toward broader acceptance of lawful marriage for any loving couple, regardless of sexual identification or orientation.  It took a half-century to reach this point, but the pace has finally quickened.  When societal acceptance advances sufficiently, that could end the straight spouse dilemma, as we know it.

The United States is only the world’s twenty-first country to legalize these unions nationwide and to guarantee all couples equal dignity in the eyes of the law.  Such legal sanctioning of same-sex marriage remains an open question in other places in the world, and familiar debates and arguments can be heard in Australia and elsewhere.  While this latest U.S. Supreme Court battle is won, there will certainly be continued push-back from states-rights advocates and others with strong negative opinions.  Dissenting Court Justice Antonin Scalia scathingly called the ruling a “threat to American democracy.”  It may take another generation for truly equal rights for all, but we appear to be moving in the right direction at last.

WAKING FROM THE NIGHTMARE

February 4th, 2015 by Carol Grever

 

After years of writing about mixed-orientation relationships, I’m still learning.  Sometimes the lessons come in curious ways.  The latest one came overnight in an extremely vivid and detailed dream.

In the dream, I’m still married to Jim, my gay husband.  Our two sons are grown and we are in our late 40’s.  We are partners in our successful staffing business, respected leaders in community and church organizations, and immersed in a busy social life.  We appear to be the “perfect couple,” though privately I suspect that, behind our glittery public façade, something critical is missing in our marriage.  We are great business partners, but Jim seems distracted at home and our intimate relations lack real passion and have become routine.  Jim has new friends that I don’t know and takes “solo vacations” occasionally.  He goes out at night, sporting flamboyant clothes, driving his expensive new convertible.  Sound familiar? 

Up to this point, my dream has been a replay of what actually happened before my husband came out of the closet.  I was simply replaying real experience in my sleep. 

Now comes the curious part.  I dream that Jim is having an affair, but not with a man.  The break from our real history is that he’s seeing another woman.  This is where “the teacher appears” in my dream.  I feel nothing but FURY.  I’m crazed with anger, hurling curses and insults, feeling utterly betrayed and rejected.  I scream and rail and throw Jim out of the house.  Then I collapse in exhaustion.  I wake up sweating, feeling panicky. 

That violent reaction in the dream is nothing like my actual waking experience when my husband told me he’s gay.  Hiding behind the nightmare’s ferocity is my quivering, vulnerable, wounded heart, whispering, “You’re not good enough.  You aren’t beautiful or sexy or desirable.  Jim doesn’t love you because you’re a loser.”  I felt like an abandoned child, overcome with a nauseating sense of utter inadequacy.  My unbridled anger was born in my broken-hearted dearth of self-worth.

In real life, our history was quite different.  Jim haltingly told me that he’s gay, a secret he’d struggled with during our whole time together.  He had lived the lie his whole adult life. He felt helpless shame and was torn apart by his own dilemma—to stay and endure an inauthentic old age, or to tell his truth and suffer the consequences.  What actually happened is that I responded at that moment with pity and compassion for his pain.  Instead of screaming at him, I put my arms around him and cried with him.  Even then, I knew that life had changed forever, and I was filled with grief, not fury.  I wept for both of us. 

As months passed after Jim came out, I learned much more about his double life and struggle to keep his clandestine affairs hidden.  I had recurring bouts of anger and despondency through those months.  It was the familiar “roller coaster” of feelings—hopeful one day and emotionally destitute the next.  Our familiar, comfortable life was falling apart, and I grieved its loss as a death.  But my major emotion was sadness, not anger.  My real-life response to Jim’s truth was totally different from this illuminating nightmare. 

My terrible dream did demonstrate something I never fully realized before.  I experienced Jim’s revelation all over again, but my response wasn’t at all like our true history.  In my dream, Jim isn’t gay.  His lovers are other women.  This critical difference attacked my deepest sense of worthiness.  It devalued me as a person.  “I’m not good enough.”  I felt unloved and unlovable--utterly worthless!  These devastating feelings caused me to strike back with incredible force.

What makes the nightmare worth sharing here is this:  Competing with another woman for my husband’s attention and affection brought forth a violent counter-attack and destructive self-doubt.  My self-esteem plummeted and I wanted to fight back.  In contrast, I actually responded sympathetically because it wasn’t about me at all.  Jim’s homosexuality is not my fault, nor is it his choice.  Sexual orientation is inborn, not learned or chosen.  If your mate is gay, it says nothing at all about your desirability or your worth.  It is simply fact.  You can’t change it, even if you are perfect in all respects.  And your spouse can’t change it either. 

Understanding this truth may help you avoid internalizing blame and shame and loss of self-respect when your spouse comes out.  Your incompatibility with your mate has nothing to do with your own attractiveness or value as a human being.  Knowing this at a deep level could open your heart--even to the possibility of empathy, friendship, and eventual forgiveness for the earlier betrayal.  It might allow you to let go of a past marred by deception and heal into confident optimism.

Years have passed since my husband told me he’s gay.  For most of the time since, I have urged other straight spouses to let go of self-blame.  There is nothing anyone can do to change sexual orientation--yours or your spouse’s.  Instead, change what you can in your unique situation, accept what you have no control over, and move toward the next stage of your life in the most positive way you can manage.  Time can heal even deep wounds.  If you can eventually forgive the hurt you’ve endured, you truly are restored and whole.

 

 

DECIDING A GREAT CIVIL RIGHTS QUESTION

January 19th, 2015 by Carol Grever

      

       The United States is approaching a definitive answer to what the New York Times calls “one of the great civil rights questions in a generation.” Our Supreme Court agreed to decide if gay marriage must be allowed in all 50 United States.  More than 70 percent of Americans already live in places where gay couples can marry.  Same-sex marriage is already legal in 36 states and the District of Columbia.  Now is the time for positive Supreme Court action.The high court will hear arguments, probably in late April of this year. 

          This news is a relevant topic for Straight Spouse Connection.  Many readers of this blog are middle-aged or older and have already been victimized by societal pressures requiring traditional marriage.  Their gay spouses felt compelled to marry to hide their sexual orientation.  Many languished in mixed-orientation relationships for decades before one spouse came out.  They are already casualties, their damage done.  Other younger gay people continue to marry straight partners because of religious beliefs, family, social or career pressures.  This news about a Supreme Court decision is germane in all these scenarios.

          Though they can’t change their past, many older straight spouses are “paying it forward.”  Perhaps their closeted anguish helped build the current momentum toward a definitive decision to honor the dignity of same-sex relationships—to prevent future grief of straight men and women unknowingly entering disastrous mixed marriages.

          The future looks brighter for those just entering marriage, gay or straight.  Legal recognition of same-sex marriage nation-wide would measurably alleviate gay people’s need to hide their sexual orientation through secrecy, deception, and double lives.  It would diminish the significant legal and emotional burdens caused by local discriminatory laws, freeing people to marry as they choose and enjoy legal protections they previously were denied.  Thus, legalizing same-sex marriage would mean fewer mismatched couples entering ill-fated gay-straight bonds, with the inevitable pain of discovery.

          Legalization of gay marriage in the United States would not be binding anywhere else in the world, but many other countries have preceded us in this decision.  Same-sex marriage is currently legal in 18 countries, the earliest acceptance by The Netherlands in 2000.  The most recent countries following suit are England, Wales, Brazil, France, New Zealand, and Uruguay in 2013, and Scotland and Luxembourg last year.  After years of political posturing and religious protestations, world opinion is leaning toward broader acceptance. 

          Surely our Supreme Court will see the need, heed the trend, and make a positive decision to sanction gay marriage.  If even one mixed-orientation couple can be saved from a doomed marriage, coerced by family, religious, social, or professional pressure, efforts to legalize same-sex marriage have not been wasted.