GAY MARRIAGE NOW PERSONAL

    My husband and I are attending a wedding October 30.  That wouldn't be especially unusual, except that the event holds particular significance in my own journey as a straight spouse.  This ceremony will join in matrimony my former husband and his male partner, and I couldn't be happier for them both.  I have moved on in my life, happily remarried.  My ex- will now be so blessed.  This joyous occasion represents a new chapter for us all.

    Until now, the controversy swirling around gay marriage has seemed somewhat academic, though I recognized that real human needs motivated the movement.  The Straight Spouse Network and PFLAG (Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays) have long advocated same-sex marriage.  They note that the freedom to marry a partner of the same gender helps to avoid the heartbreak of mixed-orientation marriages.

    There's a big difference between co-habitation and marriage, and every committed couple who desires it should have the legal benefits and comfort of formal wedlock.  It's a civil right.  Now that it affects the father of my children, this issue has assumed personal impact.

    What does legal marriage mean in a couple's daily life?  In my opinion, the greatest personal and social benefit is that wedlock assumes fidelity.  It obviously discourages promiscuous sex, hence diminishing the spread of STDs and AIDS. 

    But that obvious argument is only the beginning.  A 1997 report to the Office of the General Counsel of the U.S. General Accounting Office listed 1,138 benefits of same-sex marriage, including rights taken for granted by traditional couples.  They involve medical, property, insurance, tax, and family protections and include

  • Joint parenting, child custody, joint adoption and foster care rights
  • Property rights; housing
  • Tax breaks for married couples
  • Shared insurance benefits and Social Security survivor benefits
  • Veterans' benefits and military service family benefits
  • Medical decisions on behalf of the partner and hospital visitation
  • Sick leave to care for the partner; bereavement leave
  • Automatic inheritance and assumption of spouse's pension
  • Domestic violence and divorce protections 

    In Colorado, where I live, the passage of an amendment to our state constitution caused an uproar.  "Amendment 2" prohibited specific legal protections for gay and lesbian people, including equality in employment, housing, and other commonly assumed rights.  The constitutional change passed by the narrowest margin and was immediately challenged by a coalition of outraged citizens.  The trial court and the Colorado Supreme Court ruled against it, agreeing that Amendment 2 infringed on homosexuals' participation in the political process and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

    Finally, in 1996, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the issue in Romer v. Evans.  In a 6 to 3 vote, the court struck the Colorado Amendment down before it was ever implemented.  Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion:

Amendment 2 classifies homosexuals not to further a proper legislative end but to make them unequal to everyone else.  This Colorado cannot do.  A State cannot so deem a class of persons a stranger to its laws.  Amendment 2 violates the Equal Protection Clause.

    While same-sex marriage was not specifically named in this amendment, matrimony is a civil right in our country analogous to those specified.  Justice Kennedy summarized the Supreme Court's decision to that effect:

We cannot accept the view that Amendment 2's prohibition on specific legal protections does no more than deprive homosexuals of special rights.  To the contrary, the amendment imposes a special disability on those persons alone.  Homosexuals are forbidden the safeguards that others enjoy or may seek without constraint.

    To those who wonder how straight spouses like me can open so fully to gay marriage, I offer a quote from the philosopher Victor Frankl.  We who lived in the concentration camps can remember those who walked through the huts, comforting others, giving away their last piece of bread, giving proof that everything can be taken from us, but one thing, the last of human freedoms: to choose our attitude, our spirit, in any given set of circumstances. 

    When I congratulate my former husband and his spouse on their marriage, I will do so with genuine good wishes for their future happiness.  It's another symbol of the "letting go" that allows complete healing from wounds of the past.

    How do you feel about this issue?  Please comment on your opinions!

4 Responses to “GAY MARRIAGE NOW PERSONAL”

  1. eve stewart\ says:

    I wish I could be so blithely urban about this whole issue. I can't. My bible still says that being a practicing homosexual is wrong and that one will lose their soul, as will I if I don't refrain from or repent from my anger over this or other sins. (Yes, I do believe that sins are present and aren't just "murder.") In Corinthians Paul said "such were some of you..." I know celebate gays and have no problem with that, but practicing gays I do not have the freedom to be so politically correct.
    It's an easy answer, but not necessarily the right one for either or nation, or our former spouses.
    I wish I could, but I can't.

  2. Dorothy Imel says:

    I was saddened by the passage of Prop 8 in California. Just when we are moving forward in the area of civil rights, we are now forcing the pendulum to swing in the opposite direction. I believe that God is not an angry, revengefully being, so why do humans make God to be so. Who really wrote the "Books" of all the religions?

  3. Louella Christy Komuves says:

    I wish you could know how much I appreciate your wonderfully expressed views in the matter of how to tell one's family/friends/etc. about your spouse's homosexuality.
    Having experienced such and having written a book about it (Silent Sagas: Unsung Sorrows -- Heterosexual Wife, Homosexual Husband -- found in Amazon -- along with your book/s, Carol) I have given the matter serious time, energies, and thoughts.
    In essence, I believe when we see a person as a unique individual instead of as "label" (gay - lesbian - even as a race - a certain age - etc.) then we can care more for another human as the special person he/she is --- one who is also loved by our Creator.
    Thanks for all you do on behalf of straight and gay spouses, Carol.

  4. Carol Grever says:

    I really value Louella's comments (July 17) because she is a great example of a straight spouse who went through the familiar struggles, faced her options with terrific courage and determination, and reconfigured her life in a beautiful way. Today, she is happy in in a new career and a new marriage, and remains friends with her former husband. She's a real success story and a great role model for all of us. Thanks for visiting and commenting on my blog, Louella!
    Carol Grever

Leave a Reply